Opponents of a plan to build a town of about 7,200 on internationally-recognised wetlands and marine park are gearing up for the imminent release of an environmental impact study (EIS) of the project.
The Queensland and Federal Governments are conspiring to allow construction, with the State Government having signed an infrastructure agreement for the project and
former Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg having rejected his department's advice that the development is "clearly unacceptable.
And the city council which instigated the project makes decisions about the project in secret and is fighting to hide relevant documents from its ratepayers.
In addition, public consultation has been “flawed and deceptive’, says community group Redlands2030.
(Image: plan from Infrastructure Agreement)
former Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg having rejected his department's advice that the development is "clearly unacceptable.
And the city council which instigated the project makes decisions about the project in secret and is fighting to hide relevant documents from its ratepayers.
In addition, public consultation has been “flawed and deceptive’, says community group Redlands2030.
(Image: plan from Infrastructure Agreement)
The EIS, requested by Mr Frydenberg, is due to examine the Toondah Harbour Project, which plans a town the size of Innisfail off Cleveland’s coast, east of Brisbane.
It has to show “how a net benefit will be achieved for the Moreton Bay Ramsar site…”
The equivalent across Australia would be to show how building a town in the waters of Coffin Bay or Wine Glass Bay or in Daintree Rainforest or Warrumbungles or the Bungle Bungles would result in an improvement to those environments.
Even the developer admits the project will have a “significant impact” on nominated “listed species” or a “threatened ecological community, or their habitat.”
If it goes ahead, an exclusive town of 3,600 homes aimed at what Jones Lang LaSalle describes as the “affluent” will stretch up to 800 metres out to sea on Ramsar wetlands the Federal Government has pledged to protect.
Outraged environmentalists have launched petitions demanding that the governments stop the destruction of habitat depended on by “the critically endangered Eastern Curlew, the critically endangered Great Knot and the vulnerable Bar-tailed Godwit…”
The project “is not a market-led proposal,” a company acting for the developers says: “it did not originate from the private sector or from the Proponent specifically.”
It has to show “how a net benefit will be achieved for the Moreton Bay Ramsar site…”
The equivalent across Australia would be to show how building a town in the waters of Coffin Bay or Wine Glass Bay or in Daintree Rainforest or Warrumbungles or the Bungle Bungles would result in an improvement to those environments.
Even the developer admits the project will have a “significant impact” on nominated “listed species” or a “threatened ecological community, or their habitat.”
If it goes ahead, an exclusive town of 3,600 homes aimed at what Jones Lang LaSalle describes as the “affluent” will stretch up to 800 metres out to sea on Ramsar wetlands the Federal Government has pledged to protect.
Outraged environmentalists have launched petitions demanding that the governments stop the destruction of habitat depended on by “the critically endangered Eastern Curlew, the critically endangered Great Knot and the vulnerable Bar-tailed Godwit…”
The project “is not a market-led proposal,” a company acting for the developers says: “it did not originate from the private sector or from the Proponent specifically.”
Image: Toondah Harbour Masterplan
Nor was it electorally driven. Karen Williams, mayor since April 2012 made no mention of wanting to develop Toondah Harbour in a detailed pitch before her election.
Craig Ogilvie, a member of the previous council, led by Mayor Melva Hobson, said: “Even though the Hobson council dreamed of enhancing the foreshore for locals and travellers it never imagined that it could grow to the monstrous rape and pillage now proposed.”
In May 2013 the Redland City Bulletin reported: “Toondah Harbour is set to be transformed into a transport and recreational precinct after Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney declared the ferry terminal a development priority on a visit to Redlands on Thursday.”
According to the story, it was the ferry terminal which was the development priority. There was no mention of residential development, merely a quote from mayor Williams who said: “…she expected the precinct to include a convention centre, accommodation and restaurants around the terminal.”
The public was asked for development ideas in 2013. An undated State Government site carries answers to questions. There is no mention of housing in the bay.
However, traffic experts Cardno started preparing a report in July 2013 on the basis there would be 1,705 homes and a “development core” jutting into the bay.
By January 2014 the project had become a residential and tourism hub and small print in a State Government document referred to “higher density” housing on a “pier/land reclamation area”.
But a council survey regarding development at Toondah in February 2014 contained no reference to building out to sea.
Mayor Williams said the survey had “shown overwhelming support for development” at Toondah Harbour but this contradicted the survey which could only say: “…the main theme appeared to be in favour of an upgrade.”
In March 2014 Mayor Williams promised the environment would be a “major consideration” but buried four paragraphs from the end of a long announcement she said: “…we know we need 800 residential and commercial units to pay for it.”
There was no mention of these units being on the wetlands.
A month later the city council released an artist’s impression of the proposal with three huge blocks of units stretching out into the sea in a straight line.
According to a State Government website: “Planning for the area was undertaken by the Queensland Government, in partnership with Redland City Council and a final development scheme was approved on 29 May 2014.”
But a link to the final development scheme results in a blank page.
A resident complained about the deception and secrecy: “All of the technical documents for the TH PDA were completed prior to the public exhibition of the plans and were in the hands of Council. They were not available at the Council Chambers nor at the library when I went to read them during the public notification period. I formally requested, three times, that the Council release the documents but my requests were not responded to…The Council continues to blunder on regardless, hiding information so the community won't know how marginal this project really is.”
Planning was undertaken by the Queensland Government and Redland Council and a final development scheme was approved on 29 May 2014 but it would be a further 18 months before these details were revealed to the public.
In September 2014 the number of homes had risen to “about 1,000” and Walker Group was appointed the preferred developer.
In a submission to a Senate Select Committee Inquiry Chris Walker, secretary of Redlands2030, said people had been “duped” in the consultation process.
The new Labor Queensland Government, which had opposed the PDA legislation while in Opposition, shocked many people when, on June 14 2015, it “formally endorsed” the project. Opposition frontbencher Jackie Trad had told Parliament in 2012 the Opposition could not support elements of the legislation that was targeted at: “powerful mining companies and wealthy developers, to the detriment of the rest of the community.”
On November 25 2015 Redland City Council News announced the release of the master plan for Toondah Harbour with “a range of residential options”. No numbers were given.
But in line with previous subterfuge, Redlands2030 discovered a business page on the council website from the same day saying there would be: “approximately 3,600 dwellings from detached houses to multi-unit apartments…”
Mr Ogilvie recalls:”Probably the most gross deception of it all is the secret deal which has been signed by the council and the developer. That deal was forced upon council a couple of months before the election when council was going into recess.
“They called special general meetings right on the eve of Christmas 2015, presented documents which were several hundred pages long and asked councillors to sign up for that secret deal.
“Unfortunately, most of the councillors didn’t have the time or the motivation, frankly, to go through that document. I think I was the only one to vote against that deal.”
It resulted in the council, Walker Group and Economic Development Queensland signing a binding Development Agreement and Infrastructure Agreement in February 2016.
Over three years the project had transformed from improving a ferry terminal to building a new town in the protected bay, a process which had “outraged local residents and environmentalists,” Redlands2030 told a parliamentary committee..
With an average of two people in each home it will be roughly the same size as Innisfail (Qld), Forbes (NSW), Ararat (Vic) or Collie (WA).
Redlands2030 objected to the secrecy which had surrounded the project and in October 2017 launched a Right to Information request for access to agreements between the council and Walker Corporation.
When the council refused to release 589 of 680 relevant documents the Assistant Information Commissioner decided there were no grounds for such a refusal.
She said: “In summary, I note that the Project represents a benefit to a private entity, Walker, to develop significant area of coastal publicly owned land and waters (most of which are protected under the Ramsar Convention) for commercial gain.”
And she pointed out: “I also consider in circumstances such as these where Walker has made large donations to both political parties that this significantly furthers the requirement for transparency and accountability…”
But the secrecy continues, with an appeal yet to be finalised.
Council hid details of the project from its ratepayers on May 23 2018 when it agreed to the master plan, with the minutes recording: “Council resolved to ensure that the report and annexures remain confidential."
The 2017 infrastructure agreement shows parts of the development overflowing the PDA area (p63). It still applies but Walker Corporation submitted a new plan on June 5 2018, still with 3,600 homes in the bay.
Massive and prolonged opposition has tagged the project as highly undesirable real estate.
More than 22,000 people have signed a Change petition, Birdlife Australia has an online petition signed by more than 8,000 people, an e-petition to Parliament was signed by more than 6,000 people, a Redland City Bulletin poll was "heavily against" the project, there are several other petitions, including one of 1,136 people and in face to face questioning of 678 people by Redlands2030, 85% opposed the plan.
Only eight of 1,419 submissions to the Federal Government did not oppose the project.
What is particularly telling is that in an 81-page analysis of 583 public submissions by Minister Seeney in May 2014 he failed to say how many objected to the project. Each petition counted as only one submission.
In last year’s state election first-time independent Claire Richardson won more than a fifth of the 30,000 votes in Oodgeroo, which includes Toondah, by campaigning against building a town in the bay.
The State Government’s support for the desecration of the bay goes against everything Labor has stood for in this regard.
It was a Queensland Labor Government which initiated both Moreton Bay Marine Park and the Ramsar listing with a commitment to protect the wetlands, and local MP Daryl Briskey reminding Parliament in 1990 of a previous fight to stop a canal estate at Toondah.
Briskey said: “It is our duty to ensure that those wetland areas survive.”
Queensland Labor’s platform states emphatically: “Labor will protect RAMSAR-listed and other wetlands across Queensland by ensuring that nearby development does not cause adverse impacts to wetlands ecological and hydrological values.”
The issue reached the ALP National Platform in this resolution: “…notes Toondah Harbour is a Ramsar-listed wetland…Recognises the importance of Ramsar listed sites to migratory wading birds…[and] Commits to protecting Australia's intertidal habitat on which these birds depend…”
A recent claim is that the Toondah project could “emulate and even surpass" development such as the Greenwich Peninsula in London, with its tower blocks of units, university, 20,000-seat entertainment arena, new offices and jobs.
The Redland City Bulletin portrayed the claim on February 12 as being a University College London report but in fact it came from a company called The Business of Cities Ltd, which advises “on the opportunities that arise from the urbanisation of jobs, business, and capital…”
The study was commissioned by the Walker Corporation.
Federal Environment Minister Suss-an Ley and Queensland Deputy Premier and Development Minister Steven Miles refused to answer questions put to them by Independent Australia.
A spokesperson for Walker Corporation said: “The master plan showing 3,600 apartments formed part of our financial offer which was signed off by both Council and EDQ (Economic Development Queensland) at the time
“3,600 units is the yield necessary to fund all of the community and tourism enabling infrastructure, facilities and amenities at no cost to the taxpayer or ratepayer, as required by the tender.”
He said the total cost would be $1.3bn. An average sale price of $361,000 for the site of each home would provide the $1.3bn. Every increase of $10,000 on that average price would result in a profit of $36 million to Walker Corpopration.
Units at the nearby Toondah Outlook development are on sale at between $610,000 and $2,625,000.
Mayor Karen Williams said: “Council has always said the project needs to stack up environmentally and like everyone I am keen to see the science and will be watching the outcomes of the Federal EIS closely.”
Redlands2030 has said: “The State Government should ‘stop the rort” and just ‘fix the port.’”
Nor was it electorally driven. Karen Williams, mayor since April 2012 made no mention of wanting to develop Toondah Harbour in a detailed pitch before her election.
Craig Ogilvie, a member of the previous council, led by Mayor Melva Hobson, said: “Even though the Hobson council dreamed of enhancing the foreshore for locals and travellers it never imagined that it could grow to the monstrous rape and pillage now proposed.”
In May 2013 the Redland City Bulletin reported: “Toondah Harbour is set to be transformed into a transport and recreational precinct after Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney declared the ferry terminal a development priority on a visit to Redlands on Thursday.”
According to the story, it was the ferry terminal which was the development priority. There was no mention of residential development, merely a quote from mayor Williams who said: “…she expected the precinct to include a convention centre, accommodation and restaurants around the terminal.”
The public was asked for development ideas in 2013. An undated State Government site carries answers to questions. There is no mention of housing in the bay.
However, traffic experts Cardno started preparing a report in July 2013 on the basis there would be 1,705 homes and a “development core” jutting into the bay.
By January 2014 the project had become a residential and tourism hub and small print in a State Government document referred to “higher density” housing on a “pier/land reclamation area”.
But a council survey regarding development at Toondah in February 2014 contained no reference to building out to sea.
Mayor Williams said the survey had “shown overwhelming support for development” at Toondah Harbour but this contradicted the survey which could only say: “…the main theme appeared to be in favour of an upgrade.”
In March 2014 Mayor Williams promised the environment would be a “major consideration” but buried four paragraphs from the end of a long announcement she said: “…we know we need 800 residential and commercial units to pay for it.”
There was no mention of these units being on the wetlands.
A month later the city council released an artist’s impression of the proposal with three huge blocks of units stretching out into the sea in a straight line.
According to a State Government website: “Planning for the area was undertaken by the Queensland Government, in partnership with Redland City Council and a final development scheme was approved on 29 May 2014.”
But a link to the final development scheme results in a blank page.
A resident complained about the deception and secrecy: “All of the technical documents for the TH PDA were completed prior to the public exhibition of the plans and were in the hands of Council. They were not available at the Council Chambers nor at the library when I went to read them during the public notification period. I formally requested, three times, that the Council release the documents but my requests were not responded to…The Council continues to blunder on regardless, hiding information so the community won't know how marginal this project really is.”
Planning was undertaken by the Queensland Government and Redland Council and a final development scheme was approved on 29 May 2014 but it would be a further 18 months before these details were revealed to the public.
In September 2014 the number of homes had risen to “about 1,000” and Walker Group was appointed the preferred developer.
In a submission to a Senate Select Committee Inquiry Chris Walker, secretary of Redlands2030, said people had been “duped” in the consultation process.
The new Labor Queensland Government, which had opposed the PDA legislation while in Opposition, shocked many people when, on June 14 2015, it “formally endorsed” the project. Opposition frontbencher Jackie Trad had told Parliament in 2012 the Opposition could not support elements of the legislation that was targeted at: “powerful mining companies and wealthy developers, to the detriment of the rest of the community.”
On November 25 2015 Redland City Council News announced the release of the master plan for Toondah Harbour with “a range of residential options”. No numbers were given.
But in line with previous subterfuge, Redlands2030 discovered a business page on the council website from the same day saying there would be: “approximately 3,600 dwellings from detached houses to multi-unit apartments…”
Mr Ogilvie recalls:”Probably the most gross deception of it all is the secret deal which has been signed by the council and the developer. That deal was forced upon council a couple of months before the election when council was going into recess.
“They called special general meetings right on the eve of Christmas 2015, presented documents which were several hundred pages long and asked councillors to sign up for that secret deal.
“Unfortunately, most of the councillors didn’t have the time or the motivation, frankly, to go through that document. I think I was the only one to vote against that deal.”
It resulted in the council, Walker Group and Economic Development Queensland signing a binding Development Agreement and Infrastructure Agreement in February 2016.
Over three years the project had transformed from improving a ferry terminal to building a new town in the protected bay, a process which had “outraged local residents and environmentalists,” Redlands2030 told a parliamentary committee..
With an average of two people in each home it will be roughly the same size as Innisfail (Qld), Forbes (NSW), Ararat (Vic) or Collie (WA).
Redlands2030 objected to the secrecy which had surrounded the project and in October 2017 launched a Right to Information request for access to agreements between the council and Walker Corporation.
When the council refused to release 589 of 680 relevant documents the Assistant Information Commissioner decided there were no grounds for such a refusal.
She said: “In summary, I note that the Project represents a benefit to a private entity, Walker, to develop significant area of coastal publicly owned land and waters (most of which are protected under the Ramsar Convention) for commercial gain.”
And she pointed out: “I also consider in circumstances such as these where Walker has made large donations to both political parties that this significantly furthers the requirement for transparency and accountability…”
But the secrecy continues, with an appeal yet to be finalised.
Council hid details of the project from its ratepayers on May 23 2018 when it agreed to the master plan, with the minutes recording: “Council resolved to ensure that the report and annexures remain confidential."
The 2017 infrastructure agreement shows parts of the development overflowing the PDA area (p63). It still applies but Walker Corporation submitted a new plan on June 5 2018, still with 3,600 homes in the bay.
Massive and prolonged opposition has tagged the project as highly undesirable real estate.
More than 22,000 people have signed a Change petition, Birdlife Australia has an online petition signed by more than 8,000 people, an e-petition to Parliament was signed by more than 6,000 people, a Redland City Bulletin poll was "heavily against" the project, there are several other petitions, including one of 1,136 people and in face to face questioning of 678 people by Redlands2030, 85% opposed the plan.
Only eight of 1,419 submissions to the Federal Government did not oppose the project.
What is particularly telling is that in an 81-page analysis of 583 public submissions by Minister Seeney in May 2014 he failed to say how many objected to the project. Each petition counted as only one submission.
In last year’s state election first-time independent Claire Richardson won more than a fifth of the 30,000 votes in Oodgeroo, which includes Toondah, by campaigning against building a town in the bay.
The State Government’s support for the desecration of the bay goes against everything Labor has stood for in this regard.
It was a Queensland Labor Government which initiated both Moreton Bay Marine Park and the Ramsar listing with a commitment to protect the wetlands, and local MP Daryl Briskey reminding Parliament in 1990 of a previous fight to stop a canal estate at Toondah.
Briskey said: “It is our duty to ensure that those wetland areas survive.”
Queensland Labor’s platform states emphatically: “Labor will protect RAMSAR-listed and other wetlands across Queensland by ensuring that nearby development does not cause adverse impacts to wetlands ecological and hydrological values.”
The issue reached the ALP National Platform in this resolution: “…notes Toondah Harbour is a Ramsar-listed wetland…Recognises the importance of Ramsar listed sites to migratory wading birds…[and] Commits to protecting Australia's intertidal habitat on which these birds depend…”
A recent claim is that the Toondah project could “emulate and even surpass" development such as the Greenwich Peninsula in London, with its tower blocks of units, university, 20,000-seat entertainment arena, new offices and jobs.
The Redland City Bulletin portrayed the claim on February 12 as being a University College London report but in fact it came from a company called The Business of Cities Ltd, which advises “on the opportunities that arise from the urbanisation of jobs, business, and capital…”
The study was commissioned by the Walker Corporation.
Federal Environment Minister Suss-an Ley and Queensland Deputy Premier and Development Minister Steven Miles refused to answer questions put to them by Independent Australia.
A spokesperson for Walker Corporation said: “The master plan showing 3,600 apartments formed part of our financial offer which was signed off by both Council and EDQ (Economic Development Queensland) at the time
“3,600 units is the yield necessary to fund all of the community and tourism enabling infrastructure, facilities and amenities at no cost to the taxpayer or ratepayer, as required by the tender.”
He said the total cost would be $1.3bn. An average sale price of $361,000 for the site of each home would provide the $1.3bn. Every increase of $10,000 on that average price would result in a profit of $36 million to Walker Corpopration.
Units at the nearby Toondah Outlook development are on sale at between $610,000 and $2,625,000.
Mayor Karen Williams said: “Council has always said the project needs to stack up environmentally and like everyone I am keen to see the science and will be watching the outcomes of the Federal EIS closely.”
Redlands2030 has said: “The State Government should ‘stop the rort” and just ‘fix the port.’”
Walker Corporation: the town in the bay.
Image: Greenwich Peninsula - Toondah could "emulate and even surpass" it.
RSS Feed
